Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Facebook buys Microsoft ad technology platform

Facebook Inc said on Thursday it had agreed to buy advertising technology from Microsoft Corp that measures the effectiveness of ads on its website, which should help in its fight with Google Inc for online advertising revenue.

Under the long-rumored transaction, Facebook will purchase the Atlas Advertiser Suite, an ad management and measurement platform that Microsoft took on with its $6.3 billion acquisition of digital ad agency aQuantive in 2007. Facebook did not say how much it paid for the technology.
Unable to make it work for its own purposes, Microsoft wrote off $6.2 billion of the aQuantive deal's value last year.
Facebook has long been dogged by doubts about the effectiveness of its ads and was embarrassed just days before its initial public offering in May when General Motors Co declared it was pulling the plug on all paid advertising on Facebook's network.
Since then, Facebook has introduced a number of tools and partnerships to prove to marketers that advertising on its social network delivers enough bang for the buck.
Brian Boland, Facebook's director of monetization product marketing, said the purchase of Atlas was not a step toward creating a much wider ad network beyond the Facebook site, but analysts believe that is Facebook's ultimate goal.
"Although the statement announcing the deal focused on Atlas' measurement tools rather than its ad targeting technology, we expect that Atlas will soon be using Facebook's data to target sponsorships, in-stream ads, and other rich ad formats across the entire web, and that's big news," said Forrester analyst Nate Elliott.
"The question now is how quickly and successfully Facebook can integrate its data with Atlas' tools, and whether they can avoid a privacy backlash as they do so. History suggests they'll struggle on both counts," he said.
Google leads the $15 billion U.S. market for online display ads with 15.4 percent share, according to researcher eMarketer, followed by Facebook with 14.4 percent.
 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 25, 2013

Yahoo chief bans working from home

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer has left hundreds of staff facing the tough choice of relocating from home to Yahoo's nearest office by June - or quitting. Photograph: Peter Kramer/AP

Marissa Mayer has ordered an end to 'remote' work as all staff are told to be in the office as part of a new era of collaboration

Surfing the web from at home might be just what Yahoo's chief Marissa Mayer wants her audience to do – but she has banned employees of the company itself from working "remotely", in an edict sent out last Friday to Yahoo's thousands of staff.
Several hundred staff must now relocate their home offices to Yahoo's nearest office outpost by June – or quit, as the former Google chief gets serious about getting the company's staff back into "meat space" so it can be a contender in the web space.
The memo from human resources chief Jackie Reses – but driven by Mayer – says that "to become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side-by-side. That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices."
But the mood of Yahoo's 11,500 employees – down from 14,100 at the end of 2011 – can be guessed from the fact that the memo is marked: "PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – DO NOT FORWARD" and that it has been forwarded to the news site AllThingsD by "a plethora" of staff, according to senior editor Kara Swisher, who broke the story.
The memo points out that even those who only work one or two days in the office will have to submit to the new regime. But it seems that what Mayer has in mind is the provision of more water coolers and coffee machines: "Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings," it says. "Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home."
Mayer was hired in secret and took over in July 2012, and soon afterwards announced that she would be having her first child – which was duly born in October. Mayer however eschewed maternity leave to go straight back to work.
Having won a number of awards – including being ranked in the "Top 50 Best Places to Work" by Business Insider in 2013, and "Top 500 Green Companies" by Newsweek in 2010 – Yahoo may find itself winning another, for "biggest group of suddenly annoyed professionals". Although the memo says that "Being a Yahoo isn't just about your day-to-day job", a number are now wondering if it might be exactly that.
One former Yahoo worker commenting at AllThingsD said that working from home made them far more productive than being in the office: "Why? I didn't have to put up with numbskull self-important programmers constantly yakking to each other LOUDLY from the next set of cubicles about non-work-related stuff, and I wasn't being distracted every 20 minutes by some bored soul coming over to my desk to go for coffee or foosball, or just to talk about the spreading ennui of knowing we were working for a company whose glory days were long over."
The UK press office declined to say whether staff here will be affected: "we do not comment on internal matters," a spokesman said.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

How Google is preparing the world for Glass

analysis Amid skepticism and name-calling ("Glassholes!"), Google makes a strategic effort to bring wearable computing to the mainstream.

Early this morning, while most of the West Coast slept, Google took the next steps in introducing Google Glass to the world.
A sleek website, highlighted by a crisp, new video, started to answer basic questions about the device for the broader world. How does it look? What does it do? Can I use it while dancing with a ballerina? (You can.)
Along with the new glimpses of Glass came a contest designed to lure early adopting enthusiasts in the United States. The simple request: "Using Google+ or Twitter, tell us what you would do if you had Glass, starting with the hashtag #ifihadglass." Contestants have until February 27 to make their pitch, and if successful, they still have to pay $1,500 to get the Explorer edition. Twitter quickly lit up with ideas, from recording fencing bouts to secretly checking Wikipedia while talking with friends. (Then there was Andre Torrez, who said he "could record your face and location and give it to a massive advertising company.")

A move to the mainstream
What's noteworthy here are the many steps Google is taking to position Glass as a mainstream product, useful in all manner of situations. The typical Google product rollout is to hold an hourlong event with the press, put up a Web page, and start selling. In contrast, Glass is a product that Google is introducing over a period of years -- announced in 2012, it won't be available to consumers until next year at the earliest. Why the slow rollout? In part, the reasons are practical: Both the hardware and the software are still in development. And as a product with no competition, Glass can afford to take some extra time coming to market.
But it may turn out that Glass' biggest challenge in the marketplace isn't the technology itself but perception. Already, Googlers spotted wearing the devices are being derided on Twitter and TechCrunch as "Glassholes." When a Glass-wearing Googler walked into Shotwell's, a bar in the Mission, owner Tom Madonna was aghast: "They (were) wearing Google Glasses! In public! In A BAR!"
"When you buy a new phone, it's in your pocket, but this, you're wearing something on your face," Madonna told Alexis Madrigal in The Atlantic. "Anyone that cares what they look like is not gonna wear Google glasses. That's my opinion," Madonna said. "If you are super nerdy and you like to show off that you're in tech and smart and all those things, I can see you probably wearing Google Glasses, but you are probably in a bubble or...new."
It's a widely held view, and one that may prove definitive, particularly if Glass can't deliver the experiences promised in that video Google released today. And yet many of the same criticisms of Glass -- it's a weirdo nerd contraption for your head -- could also be said of Bluetooth headsets, which sold 40 million units in their first four years on the market. Sales slowed as the devices came to be perceived as eyesores. But the headsets serve a single purpose -- making phone calls -- that itself is on the decline. Google Glass promises to deliver a dynamic heads-up display for the world around you. It just has to convince you to try it. 

Google's Project Glass electronic eyewear is "strong and light,"  

So how does Google do that? The strategy looks like this.
1. Arm the developers.
2. Court evangelists.
3. Win the mainstream.

The developers
The arming of developers began last year, at Google I/O, when Glass-wearing parachutists jumped out of blimps and streamed the entire thing to an audience of slack-jawed programmers inside San Francisco's Moscone Center. It continued last month at Google Glass Foundry, when developers in New York and San Francisco got to start building applications for the device. Google coyly teased the event with a series of photos that said nothing about software development but still managed to show a diverse group of developers looking handsome and futuristic. The photos were reposted to nearly every tech news outlet on the Web.
The result of these efforts will be to ensure that a range of applications are available for Glass the day it launches, likely including some that you already use today on your smartphone. Evernote CEO Phil Libin told me that he began dreaming about all the ways his service could work with Glass the moment he saw it; when I asked the PR team whether the company had attended Glass Foundry last month, I got the kind of swift "no comment" that can only be the result of a nondisclosure agreement. But apps like Evernote will be essential to Glass' prospects -- familiar apps will make a strange, new device seem less so.

The evangelists
Google's next step is to build an army of people who can promote Glass by word of mouth. In the year since the device was announced, Google has regularly shown off Glass to visitors in Mountain View and guests at its parties. It gave demonstrations to tech reporters, this one included. In a triumph of aspirational marketing, Google put Glass on runway models at a Diane von Furstenburg show for Fashion Week. And Googlers are increasingly spotted wearing Glass in the wild -- Sergey Brin, who runs the Google X division where Glass is being built, is rarely spotted in public these days without it.
All these moves start to build buzz for Glass, as people given early access brag to friends about their experience wearing the device. To date Google has managed the neat trick of showing Glass off enough times to build awareness while still having a sighting feel like a genuine event, something you talk about with friends for days after.
Today's move will only create more evangelists. The #ifihadglass hashtag is already taking off on Twitter and Google+. The contestants will undoubtedly come up with creative uses for Glass that only serve to make the product look cooler. And it will all get outsized attention, as we collectively wonder whether wearable computing is on the verge of breaking through to the mainstream and whether Google is the company that makes it happen.

The mainstream
All of which will lead to step three. To win the mainstream Google will have to persuade those skeptics that wearable computers offer significant and unique benefits, enough to offset the risk of being branded a Glasshole by passersby. The surest way to do that is ubiquity -- but how does Google sell Glass in the first place?
Here's where those rumored retail stores come into play. As with other breakthrough devices, including the iPhone and the iPad, Glass benefits from first-hand experience. Snap a few photos, take some video, Google a few things with your voice, and suddenly that skepticism begins to soften.
None of these strategies will matter if Glass itself falls short -- if the user interface proves too difficult to muster, if the battery life falls short, if the price doesn't come down from $1,500 fast enough. Perceptions can be hard to change, and the critics will only get louder when the device comes to market. But Google, methodical and relentless, is taking the long view. If Google Glass is a success in 2014, it will be because of steps the company starts taking years before it ever went on sale.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Microsoft attacks Google over Gmail privacy

Microsoft has continued its campaign against Google with a new site claiming that users who allow their emails to be scanned for ads are getting "Scroogled". 

 

In its promotion of Outlook.com, Microsoft highlights what it claims is Gmail's "invasion of your privacy" on its Scroogled website.
"Outlook.com is different," Microsoft says, "we don't go through your email to sell ads.
The site includes a feed of quotes from Eric Schmidt, Google's executive chairman, including his infamous declaration that "if you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place". 


The Gmail campaign follows a series of Scroogled adverts last year that targeted Google's privacy policies.  

According to Microsoft, 70 per cent of people don't know that some email services scan the text of their messages to deliver advertising. The company says that, according to its own survey, 88 per cent of people disapprove of the practice.
Nevertheless, some industry observers have argued that Microsoft omits certain facts. For example, Microsoft claims there is no way to opt out of targeted advertising in Gmail, which is not strictly true.
Danny Sullivan, a search engine and online marketing expert, wrote on his blog: "Is the campaign fair? I’d say mostly no, but there are some things that Google could do to improve things."

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Rupert Murdoch tweets Chinese 'still hacking' WSJ


Rupert Murdoch has said that the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) newspaper remains under attack from Chinese hackers.

News Corp's chairman and chief executive made the accusation via a post on Twitter.

The WSJ reported last week that hackers had tried to monitor its coverage of China. That followed news that the New York Times believed it had also been infiltrated over a four-month period.

China's foreign ministry has denied any government involvement.

Despite this accusations have continued to mount.

On Saturday The Washington Post revealed it too had been the victim of a "sophisticated cyber-attack" dating back as far back as 2008, which had been discovered in 2011.

The paper said that "company officials suspect [it] was the work of Chinese hackers".

Google's chairman, Eric Schmidt, has also recently pointed the finger at the country.

'Ongoing issue'

He has written a book which says that China is the "most sophisticated and prolific" hacker of overseas companies, adding that "the disparity between American and Chinese firms and their tactics will put both the government and the companies of the US as a distinct disadvantage".

Rupert Murdoch's tweet adds to allegations that the threat is ongoing.

"Chinese still hacking us, or were over weekend," he tweeted. He did not reply to requests for more information and a spokeswoman for the WSJ declined to comment.

The WSJ had previously reported that hacking groups had entered its network via computers in its Beijing office. It said they then infiltrated its global computer system, targeting journalists in its Beijing bureau among others.

The paper said that security specialists had erased several of the company's hard drives in its Chinese bureau last year after the discovery, and that it had completed other efforts to overhaul its systems at the end of January.

However, a spokeswoman for the paper's publisher, Dow Jones, added that the firm recognised that data security was "an "ongoing issue".

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei has stressed that local laws forbid hack attacks and that the original claims printed by the New York Times were "groundless".
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Google boss Schmidt labels China an 'IT menace'


Google Chairman Eric Schmidt uses a new book to call China an Internet menace that backs cyber-crime for economic and political gain, reports say.

The New Digital Age - due for release in April - reportedly brands China "the world's most active and enthusiastic filterer of information".
China is "the most sophisticated and prolific" hacker of foreign companies, according to a review obtained by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).
China denies allegations of hacking.
Revolution coming?
Beijing has been accused by several governments, foreign companies and organisations of carrying out extensive cyber espionage for many years, seeking to gather information and to control China's image. 

The New Digital Age analyses how China is dangerously exploiting an Internet that now permeates politics, business, culture and other aspects of life, the WSJ says.
It quotes the book as saying: "The disparity between American and Chinese firms and their tactics will put both the government and the companies of the United States at a distinct disadvantage."
This, it says, is because Washington "will not take the same path of digital corporate espionage, as its laws are much stricter (and better enforced) and because illicit competition violates the American sense of fair play".
The book argues that Western governments could do more to follow China's lead and develop stronger relationships between the state and technology companies.
States will benefit if they use software and technology made by trusted companies, it suggests.
"Where Huawei gains market share, the influence and reach of China grow as well," the WSJ quoted the authors as writing.
The WSJ this week said its computer systems had been hacked by specialists in China who were trying to monitor its China coverage.
It was the second reported attack on a major US news outlet in days, as the New York Times reported earlier that Chinese hackers had "persistently" penetrated its systems for the last four months.
China's foreign ministry dismissed the New York Times' accusations as "groundless" and "totally irresponsible".


Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, January 31, 2013

A new BlackBerry tablet? Don't bet on it

Even the BlackBerry CEO concedes it's a tough business, and doesn't sound confident about another tablet anytime soon. A BB10 update is coming to the PlayBook though.

Don't hold your breath for a sequel to the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet.
Speaking to the press yesterday during the BlackBerry 10 launch event, CEO Thorsten Heins wasn't particularly upbeat about tablets.
"The tablet business is rather difficult," he conceded. 

Indeed, the tablet market has seen a lot of entrants, but only a few winners. While Apple's iPad franchise continues to dominate, its market share is eroding to only a few players, including Google's Nexus 7, Amazon's Kindle Fire franchise, and a few of the Samsung Electronics tablets. But that doesn't leave a lot of room for a company like BlackBerry (formerly Research in Motion), which is struggling to claw its way back into the smartphone business.
"Personally, I think it's pretty futile at this point," said Jan Dawson, an analyst at Ovum. "Like Apple, (BlackBerry) really has to make its margin on the device, but it can't charge a premium like Apple."
Heins said as much when he said that he was only interested in pursuing areas that were profitable, indicating he doesn't see much money to be made in the tablet business right now.
BlackBerry, of course, had been burned pretty badly with its first tablet in April 2011. The PlayBook was a favorite project for then co-CEO Mike Lazaridis that ended up as a major embarrassment for the company when it launched. It was the first device to use the QNX operating system, which is what BlackBerry 10 is based upon, but lacked critical features such as BlackBerry Messenger and e-mail.
BlackBerry steadily updated the software for the PlayBook, filling in missing features, and heavily discounted the product, resulting in an increasing trickle of sales. The company shipped 255,000 PlayBooks in the fiscal third quarter, a paltry number by normal standards, but impressive given that the product is nearly two years old.
Heins said BlackBerry was working on a BlackBerry 10 update for the PlayBook, although he didn't specify when it would come out. 

He also opened the door to BlackBerry potentially building tablets to address specific industries, but from the looks of it, those plans are just that. He talked about the potential to sell additional services to that industry.
"We want to provide a value proposition that isn't just hardware, but software too," he said.
But it's unclear whether businesses would even want to use a BlackBerry tablet, especially with tablets running Windows 8 starting to come in to the market. Despite a large presence in the business world, the company doesn't have experience catering its products for individual industries, also known as verticals.
"(BlackBerry) has no real credibility as a vertical provider," Dawson said. "It's never done anything vertical specific before and most industries can see through superficial verticalization pretty easily."
Heins is taking a look at this area because the consumer market for tablets looks even more frightening to a company in BlackBerry's position. 

While Apple's core iPad continues to flourish under the $500 price point, few other tablets have seen that kind of success. The Kindle Fire made its mark with its lower price point, and the Nexus 7 likewise hit the $200 mark. The pressure from the lower-priced tablets forced Apple to offer the lower priced iPad Mini, which yields less profitability, something investors have knocked the company for.
In this environment, BlackBerry would be hard pressed to make a quality product that retails at such a low price and make money off it.
"So it's stuck between pricing at cost like Amazon and Google and effectively losing money, or charging a higher rate and therefore not selling many," Dawson said.
So if you're a hardcore BlackBerry fan looking for a tablet, the PlayBook may be your best -- and only -- bet. 








Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, January 28, 2013

Apple users address privacy campaign against Google


A group of users Apple Safari web browser campaign against Google over privacy concerns.They claim that Google Safari bypassed security settings to install cookies to track movements on the internet.Between summer 2011 and spring 2012 was certainly they Google this were not the case, and believed to be safe safari locations.Until one has started legal proceedings against Google.Has instructed a law firm to coordinate additional demands made by other individuals.Fined last year Google $ 22.5m (£ 14m) in the United States for the same acts.The cookies collected data on the activities of online the Google web users in order to provide them with more targeted advertising.Judith Vidal-Hall, former editor of Index on Censorship magazine, the first person in the UK to start a legal action."Google claims it does not collect personal data but does not say which determines what information is 'personal'," she said."Whether something is private or not should be up to the surfer internet, Google. ... Best not to make a decision."When Google fined by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in 2012, said chairperson Jon Leibowitz that all of the company "to keep their privacy promises to customers."But the penalty for Google misrepresenting its actions Safari users other than the actual act of bypassing the security arrangements, and the firm was not required to admit wrongdoing.Google declined to comment on the latest action, which was launched to coincide with Data annual sixth Privacy Day in the United Kingdom.'No accident'"This incident was no accident," said Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch campaign group civil liberties PA News agency."Google Tracking people when they were explicitly told that they did not want to track, and so it is no surprise to see consumers who believe that their privacy was steamrollered by corporate greed seeking redress through the courts."This case may very important legal precedent to help consumers protect their privacy against a profit-led decisions to ignore the rights of people."According to the analystics network service StatCounter, at the end of% 2012 7.92 global sample of three million net users access the internet via Safari, and 36.42% used Google Chrome browser.
Enhanced by Zemanta