Showing posts with label European Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European Commission. Show all posts

Monday, February 11, 2013

Broadband campaigners criticise EU over billion-euro budget cuts

Fund for developing high-speed connections in rural areas slashed by €8.2bn as part of cost-cutting measures

Broadband campaigners say EU budget cuts hammered out last week will kill high-speed connections needed by rural homes and businesses, after it emerged the budget for rural broadband – seen as vital to creating new businesses – has been cut by €8.2bn (£7bn) to just €1bn.
They also warned that the European parliament, which has to sign off the new budget, could block the cuts, which saw infrastructure investment plans of €50bn over seven years slashed to just €24bn – the largest slice of the €34bn in cuts pushed for by David Cameron.
However, unrest among MEPs over the cuts to infrastructure spending could lead to some of the cuts being reversed when the budget comes to a vote in March or April.
"It's a giant leap backwards," said Brian Condon, a director of the Community Broadband Network, which provides support for community-based schemes. "In the UK, broadband policy is being dictated by the big players, which is characterised by two things – incrementalism and centralisation."
The EC has an ambitious plan, the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), which included a plan to enable broadband connections of up to 100 megabits per second (Mbps) for half of Europe's population by 2020, with the rest on 30Mbps.
Of that, €9.2bn of funds were earmarked to help develop rural broadband, where long distances and low population density make high-speed systems initially uneconomic for private second companies.
But the cuts mean that is now out of reach, said Charles Trotman, of the Country Land and Business Association. "This would mean it's up to member states or the private sector to put up the funding," he said. "It's highly unlikely that certain member states would be able to. Just a billion euros isn't going to be enough."
Neelie Kroes, the European Commission vice president, criticised the cut, saying that "this funding will have to be exclusively for digital services: because such a smaller sum does not leave room for investing in broadband networks."
Kroes said that although the 2020 targets "may be harder to reach" she was not giving up on them. "I will keep fighting," she said.
But BT, which has won a number of contracts with UK government funding under its BDUK scheme, said that the budget cuts would not affect buildout of fibre here, because the BDUK budget was ring-fenced.
BT said: "BT had no plans to make use of CEF and its reduction (from €9bn to €1bn) should have no impact on existing or planned funded projects, such as Cornwall, Northern Ireland or the BDUK process. We support the European Commission's ambitions to encourage widespread broadband deployment – the UK is seeing the fastest roll-out of any European country and this progress will continue."
The Fibre to the Home Council, a pressure group pushing for wider buildout of high-speed connections, said it was "very disappointed" by the move: "The decision shows that there still is a lack of understanding of European governments on the importance of future-proof broadband networks."
The EC reckoned the broadband investment could stimulate further investment worth €50bn, reaching 45 million households and more than 100 million people. "Investment in broadband will make Europe more competitive, will help build Digital Single Market and will create jobs," it said in the justification for the budget.
The UK had been in the middle of the field for broadband until the budget cuts, Trotman said. "BT has said that it wouldn't be until 2017 to 2018 before it had adequate structures in place."

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Google set for Brussels showdown

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase
EU commissioner accuses internet search giant of giving undue prominence to its own services following complaints from rivals

Google faces an imminent battle with Joaquin Almunia after the EU competition chief said the company was 'abusing' its dominant position. Photograph: Olivier Hoslet/EPA
Brussels is moving towards a regulatory showdown with Google after the European commission's competition chief accused the company of diverting internet users to its own services.
Joaquín Almunia believes Google is giving undue prominence to its own services such as news, maps and shopping comparison, driving traffic to them to the detriment of rival websites. The EU is reiterating its tough stance despite a decision last week by US regulators not to impose changes on Google's search business.
Google prioritises paid-for search results, but its "natural" or unsponsored results are meant to be undistorted by financial interests and based on criteria such as the popularity or relevance of individual websites.
"We are still investigating, but my conviction is [Google] are diverting traffic," Almunia told the Financial Times. "They are monetising this kind of business, the strong position they have in the general search market and this is not only a dominant position, I think – I fear – there is an abuse of this dominant position."
His comments suggest Brussels will hold the line against Google, despite the US federal trade commission's decision last week not to impose sanctions.
Google chairman Eric Schmidt met Almunia before Christmas and will submit detailed proposals suggesting remedies by the end of January.
This could mark the first time that the US group has bowed to regulatory pressure to change its core search business.
The complaints against Google were brought by Microsoft, which has a rival search engine called Bing! and runs parts of Yahoo!'s search operations, and by travel websites Expedia and TripAdvisor, and British company Streetmap.
The commission said last May it had four main concerns, the first being possibly distorted "natural" search. The second fear is that Google copies content such as user reviews from competing services and uses it in its own offerings without permission.
"In this way they are appropriating the benefits of the investments of competitors," the commission stated.
The third fear is that Google forces other websites for which it sells and delivers search adverts to work with it exclusively.
The fourth relates to how easily search advertising campaigns booked via Google can be transferred to other platforms for search advertising.
Almunia said Google was taking a constructive approach but that Brussels would be "obliged" to issue formal charges if the remedies it suggests fall short. In theory remedies could include flagging when Google services are artificially given a higher billing than rivals.
Google said: "We continue to work co-operatively with the European commission."
If the case moved to the courts and the EC showed that Google had broken EU antitrust laws through the abuse of a dominant position, Google could be fined 10% of its worldwide revenues – which for 2011 amounts to €2.9bn (£2.3bn).
The Commission could also force its own choice of changes on Google, although fines have been easier to impose in previous cases than practical remedies. Microsoft, which fell foul of Brussels regulators over the preferential treatment it gave to its own Internet Explorer browser within Windows software, has been fined €1bn but is still being pursued for not complying with requests to offer users a choice of browsers as the default for their PC.
Enhanced by Zemanta