Showing posts with label Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Show all posts

Sunday, February 17, 2013

1-2 Celestial Punch Raises Questions About Space Object Defenses


Two big space rocks, two close calls, within 24 hours: The large meteor that burned up over northern Russia Thursday surprised everyone, while Friday's close fly-by of a 150-foot-long asteroid was discovered less than a year ago. Suddenly, a scenario for a Michael Bay movie is that much closer to reality and is sparking discussions about tracking and defending threats from space.

A blazing meteor streaked across the skies of Russia on Thursday, leaving a large smoke trail in its wake before blowing up over the remote town of Chelyabinsk in the Ural mountains. More than 1,000 people reported injuries, and windows across the region were shattered by a deafening sonic boom.

A meteor seen flying over Russia on Feb. 15 at 3:20:26 UTC impacted Chelyabinsk. Preliminary information is that this object was unrelated to asteroid 2012 DA14, which made a safe pass by Earth today. (Image credit: Google Earth, NASA/JPL-Caltech)  

On Friday, a 150-foot-wide asteroid named 2012 DA14 whizzed by the Earth with just over 17,000 miles of separation to spare. That makes it the closest approach ever to the planet for a space rock of that size.
The two celestial events were not connected, NASA said; they approached the Earth from different trajectories. Yet they are just two of several meteors and asteroids that have come close to the Earth in the past few years.
There are between 3,200 and 4,700 potentially hazardous asteroids in our solar system, NASA estimated. This week's sky shows, while fascinating to watch, have spurred discussions about whether the system for detecting potentially dangerous meteors and asteroids is adequate -- and if not, what is being done about it. 

More on the Chelyabinsk Meteor

The meteor that exploded over Chelyabinsk was the largest reported since 1908, when one hit Tunguska in Siberia. It entered the atmosphere at about 40,000 mph, or 18 km per second, NASA said, and released several hundred kilotons of energy.
The meteor measured about 49 feet and had a mass of about 7,000 tons. It was brighter than the sun, and its trail was visible for about 30 seconds. It had a very shallow angle of entry.
The meteor might have exploded because it was either big or dense enough that it didn't burn up entirely in the atmosphere, but still experienced "immense aerodynamic pressures [that were] enough to structurally deform it," said Ben Corbin, a Ph.D. candidate in aeronautics and astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "It's simply a matter of how much energy is getting displaced at once."
If the meteor had hit a densely populated area, it could have taken out an entire city, William Newman, professor of earth and space sciences at the University of California at Los Angeles, told TechNewsWorld.

Blind Man's Bluff

The other big space rock to make the news, 2012 DA14, was discovered on February 23, 2012, and has been tracked closely since then. That raises the question of why the Chelyabinsk meteor seemed to have come out of nowhere.
One reason: The Chelyabinsk meteor was too small, being about 1.5 meters on a side, whereas 2012 DA14 "is about half the size of a football field," Newman said. "It's possible to see a railroad car heading towards us at a distance, but it's impossible to see a baseball or bullet heading our way."

 Asteroids that cross the Earth's orbit are only visible in daytime, so they're harder to observe than those outside Earth's orbit, Corbin told TechNewsWorld. They can be detected with radar, but that technology can only be used to find objects when they're very close, because radar waves have to be bounced off the subject.
NASA maintains a database of asteroids that could impact the planet as part of its Near Earth Object program.
The program "is able to detect about 90 percent" of the larger asteroids that could impact Earth, and "we're getting to the point where we'll be able to detect almost all of those," Newman said.

A Future Early Warning System?

The Chelyabinsk meteor shows the need to set up spacecraft circling the Earth to intercept and evaluate incoming threats, argued Rick Tumlinson, chairman of Deep Space Industries, which plans to mine asteroids for their precious metals.
The company is working on the FireFly spacecraft that would begin prospecting for potential target asteroids in 2015, and the larger Dragonfly spacecraft that would do the actual mining work.
Placing a circle of 10 Fireflies around the planet would cost about US$100 million and take about four years, Tumlinson estimated.
"We're talking about space budgets," Tumlinson told TechNewsWorld. "The idea is to send out the Fireflies to take close-up shots, then for the Dragonflies to come back with samples so they can be analyzed. By 2021, we can make contact with the asteroids and figure out which ones can be mined safely, and which will need to have their orbits shifted so they don't threaten Earth."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Robot Makers Automation World Spread Gospel


The robot equipment industry is one word for alarmist articles and television news programs to predict the registration is about to steal your job: Fiddlesticks!

Well, not the actual use of the word this week at the Automate 2013 trade show held here by Thursday, but the sentiment was the same. During a presentation on Monday, tax Henrik I. Christensen, Chairman of Kuka Robotics at the Georgia Institute of Technology College of Computing, sharp recent "60 Minutes" report on automation was based on the work of the MIT economists Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson.The two economists in 2011 wrote "Race Against the Machine," a book renewed the debate about the relationship between the speed of automation and employment growth. They argue that accelerating the pace of automation and robotics are pushing into new areas of the workforce as a white-collar jobs were previously believed to be outside the scope of computers.During his talk, Dr. Christensen said that the evidence showed that the opposite was true. While automation can change the workforce and the elimination of certain positions, it also creates new types of jobs generally pay better and require highly skilled workers."We see today that the United States is still the largest manufacturing country in terms of dollar value," Dr. Christensen said. "It is also important to remember that manufacturing produces more jobs in areas related than anything else."An officer of the International Federation of Robotics automation debate had sprung back to life in the United States, but he said that America alone was a concern of robots and automation."This is not happening in either Europe or Japan," said Andreas Bauer, chairman of the executive group of the federal industrial robot suppliers and Kuka Robotics, a German robot manufacturer.To support the claim that automation is not a job killer but instead a way for the U.S. to compete against foreign competitors are becoming more advanced, the industry group reported results on Tuesday that he said he would published in February. The federation said the industry would directly and indirectly create 1900000-3500000 jobs worldwide by 2020.Federal news media event was described two chief executives of small American manufacturers how they were able to increase both employment and compete against foreign companies rely heavily on automation and robots."Automation is our ability to compete globally. Fully have created jobs in southwest Michigan," said Matt Tyler, chief executive of Vickers Engineering, an auto parts supplier. "It was not posted for automation, we would not beat our Japanese competitors; we want to beat our competitors of China; we want our competitors beat Mexico. Fact."Also the case was Drew Greenblatt, quoted widely president and owner Marlin Steel, a Baltimore manufacturer of steel products have managed to expand and post other are deploying robots and machines to workers' productivity."In December, we had a job from a Chicago company that bought more than a decade from China," he said. "It is sheet-metal bracket; 160,000 sheet metal brackets, year after year. Was in China, now they are made in Baltimore, using a steel plant in Indiana and made the robot in Connecticut."A German robotics engineer argued that automation was necessary to preserve jobs and is also essential that a national economy can support social programs."Countries with high productivity can be a good social system and a good health system," said Alexander Verl, one of the Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering in Germany. "You see to some extent in Germany or Sweden. Countries are highly automated, but at the same time that they spend money on elderly care and the health system."In a report presented Tuesday at the federal, the U.S. lags Germany, South Korea and the Japan the manufacturing robots employees density (measured as the number of robots per 10,000 workers). South Korea, in particular, a sharp increase in the robot-to-worker ratio in the last three years and Germany has twice the density of robot as the United States, according to a presentation by a John Dulchinos member of the board of Adept Industrial Association chief Robot Technology, a maker of Pleasanton, Calif., robots.The report shows that while China and Brazil are increasing the number of robots in factories, they still trail the advanced manufacturing countries.Mr. Dulchinos said the United States had only itself to blame for the decline in the manufacturing sector over the past decade."I can tell you that at the end of the 1990s, my company was the largest segment of the cellular phone market," he said. "Overnight the industry almost went away, partly because we did not do as good a job which required that the competitive industry."He said that if the higher American robots it would be possible for the companies to maintain the lowest cost of production in the United States."They all got packed up and shipped to China," said Mr. Dulchinos. "And so you fast forward to today and there are over one billion cellphones are produced per year and that one produced in the United States."But, despite the growing concern about the effects of automation on the economy, some of the bright spots. The industry is now generating $ 25 billion in annual revenue. The Federation hopes to produce 1.6 million robots each year by 2015.Mr. Greenblatt said that one of the advantages of robots they did not take breaks."My robots are going to work during the Super Bowl," he said. "Do you know how popular I'd have to ask my employees to work during the Super Bowl?"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, January 21, 2013

Dotcom Fights the Law With New Mega Site


Kim Dotcom is back, and it seems to be not one iota less bravado in him than before the takeover last year of his Megaupload site.'s Dramatic raid on his house and his indictment by U.S. authorities on piracy charges Although Dotcom legal tussle with the U.S. is far from over, he promises that his new, fully encrypted mega site is legally compliant.
Kim Dotcom on Sunday opened the doors to the new file sharing site Mega. The website is. Splash in the file-sharing world, with its promise of exceptional privacy and securityThat's not the only reason why mega-debut is remarkable, but: Dotcom is the founder of Megaupload, which was itself shut down by the U.S. authorities after accusations of piracy against Dotcom and other Megaupload execs and seizure of financial receivables and other assets .In fact, the introduction of Mega as defiant gesture towards the United States, the dotcom committing online piracy has seen a large scale over Megaupload defendants.The introduction of mega-might actually be helpful, Dotcom, speculated David Johnson, CEO of Strategic Vision.Intersecting NarrativesThe introduction of mega follows shortly after the suicide of Reddit co-founder Adam Swartz, who was facing major prison and fines in a federal investigation of the theft of millions of scholarly articles.Swartz reportedly items from a computer archive at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in a bid to have them available free. His trial was about to begin, and if convicted, he would be subject to a set of widely considered excessively hard and not in keeping with the alleged crimes. Since his death, the focus of the story Swartz has unfair advantage on the issue of the prosecutor's office and the need to reform U.S. computer crime shifted.Dotcom Swartz case and the "crimes are not the same and not the same situation at all," Johnson said. They "had apparently different motivations." However, it seems to share that the two high-profile cases, certain compounds.One Year AgoThe Federal Bureau of Investigation shut down MegaUpload about a year ago for reasons that it was used to illegally share copyrighted digital content.Since then, U.S. officials have tried to Dotcom, a stand in New Zealand resident, delivered before the court in the States. The case is stuck in the New Zealand courts, which considered whether raids conducted on Dotcom New Zealand Mansion in 2012 were legal."I'm sure his lawyer prefer it more low key to be," Johnson said of the sometimes flamboyant Dotcom ", but the introduction of Mega is the perfect way to keep him in the forefront and subtly argue with potential jurors that doing it wrong. "A lot of people will no doubt consider the site because of the dotcom fame, added Johnson.A Lot Like YouFor file sharers who like under the radar of copyright owners and the associations that represent them want to fly, there are a lot of Mega.Unlike its competitors, Mega used "state of the art browser-based encryption technology, where we do not control the keys" Mega says on its website.One conclusion that can be drawn from this promise is that users will be less likely to identify with the persecution of organizations. Lest there be any doubt dotcom involvement, his name is listed in the first mega-group design.Made the launch party for the website of light colorful history is Megaupload. It allegedly contained scantily clad bodyguards as apparent Dotcom line defense against a mock raid, complete with an "FBI" helicopter hovering over the meeting.
 



Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, January 19, 2013

The battery that grounded Boeing

U.S. officials grounded Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner because the aircraft's advanced batteries appear to be malfunctioning. But what's the problem? And can it be fixed?

 

To reduce weight on the plane, Boeing relied heavily on lithium ion batteries -- the same type found in mobile phones and laptops.


While these batteries can produce a lot of power for their weight, they're also prone to problems. It was these same batteries that caught fire in laptops a few years back and, more recently, were suspected culprits in electric car fires.

How they work: Ions from the element lithium tease out energy from the battery's electrodes, according to Donald Sadoway, a materials chemistry professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

This is different from other types of batteries commonly used in electronics, which use a combination of nickel and cadmium or lead and acid, among other things.

Why they're better: Lithium is the lightest of all metals, so its ions hold energy more efficiently -- more than twice as much per unit of weight as nickel cadmium batteries.

This made the batteries attractive for Boeing (BA, Fortune 500), which used them to electronically assist some of the functions that were previously performed using hydraulics. A lighter plane is more fuel efficient, which is one of the main selling points for the 787. Other aircraft makers have also been using more lithium ion batteries. 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta